Supporting Documents:
Job Description - 20016371_Research Informatics Specialist
Job Posting - https://ou.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?job=240734
Hiring Committee:
Tyler Pearson (Chair)
Mary Stoll
Jessica Lumry
Michael Malahy
Invited Stakeholders
(invited to on-site Interview stage)
Jessica Davila, Associate Dean, DSI
Denise Stephens, Dean, UL
Kristi Wyatt
Mark Laufersweiler
Liaison Librarians (TBD)
Position Outreach
ALA: Sonya 3/28
ARL: Sonya 3/28
CLIR and DLF job board
Chronicle of Higher Education: Sonya 3/28
HigherEd Jobs
Code4Lib: Tyler on 3/25
LinkedIn: Tyler on 3/25
Interviewing Timeline
Application Open | March 22nd 2024 |
First Consideration Date | March 22nd - April 22nd |
1st Round of Application Reviews | April 22nd - April 26th |
1st Round Interviews - Zoom | April 29th - May 3rd |
Send on-campus interview schedule to candidates | 1 week in advance of visit |
2nd Round Interviews - on site | May 20th - May 24th |
Report to the Dean | June 3rd |
Reference Checks | After Dean’s approval |
Offer | After Dean’s approval |
Interview Funnel
HR’s screening based on our posted requirements and review of candidate cover letters and resumes.
First Interview: 45-60-minute initial call with candidates to discuss the position, answer questions, and get a general sense of the candidate.
Questions are available in a separate file in SharePoint.
Questions Focused on expertise and teamwork:
~ 5 minutes for introductions
~ 15 minutes to ask prepared question set, emailed to candidate in advance, but answered in the interview.
~ 30 minutes to ask on-the-spot question set, not shared with candidate in advance
~ 10 minutes reserved for interviewee questions
Second Interview: about 60 minutes, split between project partners and leadership. An opportunity for our top candidate(s) to meet with product stakeholders and leadership, focused on culture and bigger picture.
Reference Check: contact references and verify the following
Reference verified that they were a good collaborator and communicator.
Reference verified that they were reliable and self-directed.
Reference confirmed the quality of their technical work.