Digital Projects Librarian Interview Process
Supporting Documents:
Job Description - 00025964_Senior Librarian.docx
Posting - https://ou.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?job=232615
Hiring Committee:
Tyler Pearson (chair)
Danica Leslie
Jessica Lumry
Kristi Wyatt
Mark Laufersweiler
Invited Stakeholders
(invite to meet one-on-one with candidates during on-site visit)
Jessica Davila
Magen Bednar
Brianna Narr
[Liaison Librarian] Claire Curry, Lina Ortega
Presentation Stakeholders
Internal Library
[Associate Dean invited]
Position Outreach
ALA
ARL
Chronicle of Higher Education
HigherEd Jobs
SLIS alumni list via June Abbas
Oklahoma Chapter of ACRL via Amanda Schilling
Code4Lib via Jessica Davila
Interviewing Timeline
Application Open | 2023-10-13 |
First Consideration Date | 2023-11-1 |
1st Round of Application Reviews | 2023-11-3 |
1st Round Interviews | Week of 2023-11-27 |
Homework Exercise | N/A |
2nd Round Interviews (Finalists) On-site | Week of 2024-1-1 |
Library Presentation | Week of 2024-1-1 |
Reference Checks | Week of 2024-1-8 |
Offer | 2024-2-9 |
Interview Funnel
HR’s screening is based on our posted requirements and review of candidate cover letters and resumes.
First Interview: 60 minutes. Focused on projects and teamwork.
~ 10 minutes for introductions and expectations of the role
~ 5 minutes for candidate to walk through resume and experiences
~ 30 minutes to ask prepared question set, emailed to candidate in advance, but answered in the interview.
~ 10 minutes reserved for interviewee questions
Second Interview: Onsite interview for about 60 minutes, split between project partners and leadership. An opportunity for our top candidate(s) to meet with product stakeholders and leadership in-person, focused on culture and bigger picture.
Presentation: 20 minute presentation in response to the provided prompt, plus 10 minutes for Q&A. This presentation will be during the candidate’s onsite visit.
Reference Check: contact references and verify the following
Reference verified that they were a good collaborator and communicator.
Reference verified that they were reliable and self-directed.
Reference confirmed the quality of their project work.